
Fragment of a furnishing textile
Unrecorded maker
possibly 1700s or 1800s · Embroidery, Linen, silk, and dye
Cleared · CC0
liveRights clearance desk for images
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
The Metropolitan Museum of Art did not answer: met answered HTTP 403
390 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
1 of 2 providers answered live. 14 matching records exist across the two collections.
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Fragment of a furnishing textile
Unrecorded maker
possibly 1700s or 1800s · Embroidery, Linen, silk, and dye
Cleared · CC0
live
Square Ornament from a Tunic
Unrecorded maker
700s · Textile, Silk; complementary weft-faced twill weave with inner warps (samite)
Cleared · CC0
live
Royal Round Tent made for Muhammad Shah (wall panel with three design units)
Unrecorded maker
1834–48 · Textile, Interior: wool: plain weave, inlaid work; silk: embroidery, chain stitch; tape, leather; Exterior: cotton, wool: plain weave; rope, iron ring
Cleared · CC0
live
Royal Round Tent made for Muhammad Shah (wall panel with three design units)
Unrecorded maker
1834–48 · Textile, Wool with silk embroidery (chain stitch), rope, cotton, leather, tape; Rasht work
Cleared · CC0
live
Royal Round Tent Made for Muhammad Shah
Unrecorded maker
1834–48 · Textile, Interior: wool: plain weave, inlaid work; silk: embroidery, chain stitch; tape, leather; Exterior: cotton, wool: plain weave; rope, iron ring
Cleared · CC0
live
Royal Round Tent made for Muhammad Shah (wall panel with one design unit)
Unrecorded maker
1834–48 · Textile, Interior: wool: plain weave, inlaid work; silk: embroidery, chain stitch; tape, leather; Exterior: cotton, wool: plain weave; rope, iron ring
Cleared · CC0
live
Royal Round Tent made for Muhammad Shah (Roof)
Unrecorded maker
1834–48 · Textile, Interior: wool: plain weave, inlaid work; silk: embroidery, chain stitch; tape, leather; Exterior: cotton, wool: plain weave; rope, iron ring
Cleared · CC0
live
Tunic Fragment with Segmentum
Unrecorded maker
c. 500 · Textile, Wool, linen, and dye
Cleared · CC0
live
Belt for a Lady's Dress
Unrecorded maker
c. 1375–1400 · Jewelry, basse-taille enamel and gilding on silver, silver thread, gilt-silver buckle, cast and chased
Cleared · CC0
live
Curtain Fragment with Panthers
Unrecorded maker
500s · Textile, Dyed wool, undyed linen: slit-tapestry weave
Cleared · CC0
live
Apricot Long Shawl
Unrecorded maker
1785–1800 · Textile, 2/2 twill tapestry weave, double interlocked; wool
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment
Unrecorded maker
1800s · Embroidery, Linen, silk, dye
Cleared · CC0
live1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.