
Fragment of a Band with Floral Motif
Unrecorded maker
1700s or early 1800s · Lace, Bleached linen (est.): needle lace, filet/lacis (knotted ground and darned in one direction)
Cleared · CC0
liveRights clearance desk for images
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
The Metropolitan Museum of Art did not answer: met answered HTTP 403
344 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
1 of 2 providers answered live. 7 matching records exist across the two collections.
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Fragment of a Band with Floral Motif
Unrecorded maker
1700s or early 1800s · Lace, Bleached linen (est.): needle lace, filet/lacis (knotted ground and darned in one direction)
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a Band with Floral Motif
Unrecorded maker
1600s–1700s · Lace, Bleached linen (est.): needle lace (knotted ground and darned in two directions)
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a Band with Floral Motif
Unrecorded maker
1700s · Lace, Bleached linen (est.): needle lace, filet/lacis (knotted ground and darned in one direction)
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a Band with Geometric Pattern and Floral Motif
Unrecorded maker
1800s · Lace, Cotton (est.): needle lace, burato (twined ground and darned in one direction)
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a furnishing textile
Unrecorded maker
possibly 1700s or 1800s · Embroidery, Linen, silk, and dye
Cleared · CC0
live
Tapestry with lattice of animals in medallions
Unrecorded maker
600s–700s · Tapestry, wool and linen: tapestry weave
Cleared · CC0
live
Embroidered Textile
Unrecorded maker
1800s · Embroidery, Plain weave piña cloth: needle lace and embroidery
Cleared · CC0
live1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.