
Glass border molding fragment
Unrecorded maker
late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE · Glass
Cleared · Public Domain
liveRights clearance desk for images
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
886 ms. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Collection API (Open Access)
369 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
2 of 2 providers answered live. 24,143 matching records exist across the two collections.
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Glass border molding fragment
Unrecorded maker
late 1st century BCE–early 1st century CE · Glass
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Fragment of a Mold for Arretine Bowl
M. Perennius
27 BCE–14 CE · Ceramic, terracotta
Cleared · CC0
live
Bronze molding fragment
Unrecorded maker
1st–2nd century CE · Bronze
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Fragment of a Mold for Arretine Bowl
Unrecorded maker
27 BCE–14 CE · Ceramic, terracotta
Cleared · CC0
liveFragment of Molding with a Pattern of Leaves
Unrecorded maker
6th century · Limestone; carved in relief
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Face Fragment
Unrecorded maker
600–1000 · Sculpture, molded pottery
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of Molding
Unrecorded maker
6th–7th century · Limestone; carved in relief
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Fragment of a Reclining Male Figure
Unrecorded maker
450–350 BCE · Sculpture, terracotta
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of Molding
Unrecorded maker
6th–7th century · Elephant ivory
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Figurine Head Fragment
Unrecorded maker
150–350 CE · Ceramic, ceramic, pigment
Cleared · CC0
liveFragment of Molding
Unrecorded maker
6th–7th century · Limestone; carved in relief
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Fragment
Benedetto Buglioni (d. 1521)
c. 1900–1910 · Sculpture, glazed terracotta
Cleared · CC0
live1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.