
Textile Fragment with Cotton Goddess
Unrecorded maker
800–500 BCE · Textile, Cotton, pigments
Cleared · CC0
liveRights clearance desk for images
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
The Metropolitan Museum of Art did not answer: met answered HTTP 403
435 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
1 of 2 providers answered live. 7 matching records exist across the two collections.
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Textile Fragment with Cotton Goddess
Unrecorded maker
800–500 BCE · Textile, Cotton, pigments
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a Staff
Unrecorded maker
late 1800s–early 1900s · Tools and Equipment, Wood, copper alloy, upholstery studs, and iron
Cleared · CC0
live
Rare Silk Tunic Fragment with Ornamental Sleeve Band
Unrecorded maker
400s-500s · Textile, plain weave: silk; tapestry weave with supplementary weft wrapping; undyed linen, dyed wool, silk
Cleared · CC0
live
Double-Arm Reliquary Cross
Unrecorded maker
c. 1100–1200 · Metalwork, gold
Cleared · CC0
live
Circular Altar with Hermes and Pallas Athena
Unrecorded maker
100 BCE–100 CE · Sculpture, marble
Cleared · CC0
live
Bacchanales: The Satyr's Dance
Jean-Honoré Fragonard (d. 1806)
1763 · Print, etching
Cleared · CC0
live
Tunic Fragments with Bird-Headed Creature
Unrecorded maker
600–1000 · Textile, Camelid fiber, cotton: tapestry weave
Cleared · CC0
live1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.