Skip to content
OpenPlate

Rights clearance desk for images

A painting can be out of copyright and thephotograph of it can still be protected.

Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.

Where this page got its records

  • The Metsealed sample 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z

    The Metropolitan Museum of Art did not answer: met answered HTTP 403

  • Clevelandlive

    364 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API

Your defaults

United States, editorial use, 10,000 reach.

Change on the terms page

1 of 2 providers answered live. 8 matching records exist across the two collections.

Results for "Fragment with peacocks and inscription"8 records

Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Fragment with peacocks and inscription by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Fragment with peacocks and inscription

Unrecorded maker

1000–1100s · Embroidery, Silk warp and cotton weft (mulham): plain weave; silk, gilt, and silver thread: embroidery, couched and split stitches

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment with peacocks and inscriptions by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Fragment with peacocks and inscriptions

Unrecorded maker

before 1968 · Textile, Silk: lampas weave

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment with peacocks and inscriptions by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Fragment with peacocks and inscriptions

Unrecorded maker

before 1968 · Textile, Silk: lampas weave

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragments with peacocks and inscriptions by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Fragments with peacocks and inscriptions

Unrecorded maker

before 1968 · Textile, lampas weave, silk

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment with Inscription by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Fragment with Inscription

Unrecorded maker

early 900s · Textile, Silk: lampas weave

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment with Inscription by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Fragment with Inscription

Unrecorded maker

before 1968 · Textile, Silk: compound tabby

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment with peacocks in ogival pattern by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Fragment with peacocks in ogival pattern

Unrecorded maker

1004–1260 (radiocarbon date, 95% probability) · Textile, Silk: plain weave with supplementary weft

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Ceremonial Cross of Count Liudolf by an unrecorded maker, The Cleveland Museum of Art

Ceremonial Cross of Count Liudolf

Unrecorded maker

shortly after 1038 · Metalwork, gold: worked in repoussé; cloisonné enamel; intaglio gems; pearls; wood core

Cleared · CC0

live
Cleveland Museum of ArtSimilar

1. Pin the work

Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.

2. Read the arithmetic

Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.

3. Seal and export

Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.