
Fragment with peacocks and inscription
Unrecorded maker
1000–1100s · Embroidery, Silk warp and cotton weft (mulham): plain weave; silk, gilt, and silver thread: embroidery, couched and split stitches
Cleared · CC0
liveRights clearance desk for images
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
The Metropolitan Museum of Art did not answer: met answered HTTP 403
356 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
1 of 2 providers answered live. 8 matching records exist across the two collections.
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Fragment with peacocks and inscription
Unrecorded maker
1000–1100s · Embroidery, Silk warp and cotton weft (mulham): plain weave; silk, gilt, and silver thread: embroidery, couched and split stitches
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment with peacocks and inscriptions
Unrecorded maker
before 1968 · Textile, Silk: lampas weave
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment with peacocks and inscriptions
Unrecorded maker
before 1968 · Textile, Silk: lampas weave
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragments with peacocks and inscriptions
Unrecorded maker
before 1968 · Textile, lampas weave, silk
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment with peacocks in ogival pattern
Unrecorded maker
1004–1260 (radiocarbon date, 95% probability) · Textile, Silk: plain weave with supplementary weft
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment with Inscription
Unrecorded maker
early 900s · Textile, Silk: lampas weave
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment with Inscription
Unrecorded maker
before 1968 · Textile, Silk: compound tabby
Cleared · CC0
live
Ceremonial Cross of Count Liudolf
Unrecorded maker
shortly after 1038 · Metalwork, gold: worked in repoussé; cloisonné enamel; intaglio gems; pearls; wood core
Cleared · CC0
live1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.