
Fragments of a Carpet
Imperial Manufactory
1600–1650 · Carpet, silk and wool
Cleared · CC0
liveRights clearance desk for images
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
The Metropolitan Museum of Art did not answer: met answered HTTP 403
395 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
1 of 2 providers answered live. 9 matching records exist across the two collections.
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Fragments of a Carpet
Imperial Manufactory
1600–1650 · Carpet, silk and wool
Cleared · CC0
live
Carpet Fragment
Unrecorded maker
late 1800s–early 1900s · Carpet, Silk: knotted pile
Cleared · CC0
live
Two-faced Carpet Fragment
Unrecorded maker
1100s · Textile, senna knot
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragments of a Carpet
Imperial Manufactory
1600–1650 · Carpet, silk and wool
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragments of a Carpet
Imperial Manufactory
1600–1650 · Carpet, silk and wool
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a Carpet Border
Unrecorded maker
1500s · Carpet, velvet (pile weave) with silk and metal thread
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a Carpet
Unrecorded maker
16th century (?) · Carpet, senna knot: wool and silk
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment of a Carpet
Unrecorded maker
16th century (?) · Carpet, silk
Cleared · CC0
live
Fragment with gold leaf lions
Unrecorded maker
1000s–1100s · Textile, Silk warp and cotton weft (mulham): plain weave; gold leaf, block printed
Cleared · CC0
live1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.