Skip to content
OpenPlate

Rights clearance desk for images

A painting can be out of copyright and thephotograph of it can still be protected.

Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.

Where this page got its records

  • The Metlive

    270 ms. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Collection API (Open Access)

  • Clevelandlive

    380 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API

Your defaults

United States, editorial use, 10,000 reach.

Change on the terms page

2 of 2 providers answered live. 596 matching records exist across the two collections.

Results for "Mold for Lily Pendant"12 records

Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

Mold for a Lily Bead by an unrecorded maker, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Mold for a Lily Bead

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1386–1347 BCE · Pottery

Cleared · Public Domain

live
The MetSimilar
Mold for a Lily Bead by an unrecorded maker, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Mold for a Lily Bead

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1386–1347 BCE · Pottery

Cleared · Public Domain

live
The MetSimilar
Mold for Umbel Pendant by an unrecorded maker, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Mold for Umbel Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1386–1347 BCE · Pottery

Cleared · Public Domain

live
The MetSimilar
Mold for Cornflower Pendant by an unrecorded maker, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Mold for Cornflower Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1347–1330 BCE · Pottery

Cleared · Public Domain

live
The MetSimilar
Mold for Cornflower Pendant by an unrecorded maker, The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Mold for Cornflower Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1347–1330 BCE · Pottery

Cleared · Public Domain

live
The MetSimilar

No open reproduction

The institution withholds the image for this record, which is itself the answer: the picture on their page is not theirs to give away.

Mold for Leaf Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1347–1330 BCE · Pottery

In copyright

live
The MetSimilar

No open reproduction

The institution withholds the image for this record, which is itself the answer: the picture on their page is not theirs to give away.

Mold for Lily Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1347–1330 BCE · Pottery

In copyright

live
The MetSimilar

No open reproduction

The institution withholds the image for this record, which is itself the answer: the picture on their page is not theirs to give away.

Mold for Petals Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1347–1330 BCE · Pottery

In copyright

live
The MetSimilar

No open reproduction

The institution withholds the image for this record, which is itself the answer: the picture on their page is not theirs to give away.

Mold for Cornflower Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1550–1080 BCE · Pottery

In copyright

live
The MetSimilar

No open reproduction

The institution withholds the image for this record, which is itself the answer: the picture on their page is not theirs to give away.

Mold for Grape Cluster Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1550–1080 BCE · Pottery

In copyright

live
The MetSimilar

No open reproduction

The institution withholds the image for this record, which is itself the answer: the picture on their page is not theirs to give away.

Mold for Heb-Sed Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1550–1080 BCE · Pottery

In copyright

live
The MetSimilar

No open reproduction

The institution withholds the image for this record, which is itself the answer: the picture on their page is not theirs to give away.

Mold for Persea Pendant

Unrecorded maker

ca. 1550–1080 BCE · Pottery

In copyright

live
The MetSimilar

1. Pin the work

Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.

2. Read the arithmetic

Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.

3. Seal and export

Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.