Fragment of a furnishing textile
Unrecorded maker
possibly 1700s or 1800s · Embroidery, Linen, silk, and dye
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Rights clearance desk for images
A painting can be out of copyright and thephotograph of it can still be protected.
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
- The Metsealed sample 2026-10-04T00:00:00.000Z
The Metropolitan Museum of Art did not answer: met answered HTTP 403
- Clevelandlive
364 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
1 of 2 providers answered live. 16 matching records exist across the two collections.
Results for "Textile fragment with floral pattern"12 records
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved
Fragment with a Floral (tendril) Motif
Unrecorded maker
1500s–1600s · Lace, Bleached and blue dyed linen (est.): needle lace, filet/lacis (knotted ground and darned in one and two directions)
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment of a Border with Vines and Floral Motifs
Unrecorded maker
1600s · Lace, Bleached and blue dyed linen (est.): needle lace, filet/lacis (knotted ground and darned in one direction) and bobbin lace edging
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Embroidered Textile
Unrecorded maker
1800s · Embroidery, Plain weave piña cloth: needle lace and embroidery
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment of a Border with Floral Vine and Geometric Patterns
Unrecorded maker
1500s · Lace, Bleached linen (est.): needle lace, burato (twined ground and darned in two directions) and reticella
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment with curving vine and palmette leaves
Unrecorded maker
1400s · Textile, Silk: lampas weave
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment
Unrecorded maker
before 1975 · Textile, Silk: lampas weave
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Lace Border
Unrecorded maker
1800s · Embroidery, Plain weave piña cloth: needle lace and embroidery
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment with inscriptions
Unrecorded maker
before 1982 · Textile, Silk: lampas weave
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment of a belt (hizam)
Unrecorded maker
1800s · Textile, Silk, dye
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Fragment
Unrecorded maker
before 1952 · Textile, Silk: compound tabby
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
Brocaded silk with foliate medallions from a kaftan
Unrecorded maker
1525–75 · Textile, Silk: lampas weave, silver-metal thread
Cleared · CC0
liveCleveland Museum of ArtSimilar
1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.