
The Rabbit Hunt
Pieter Bruegel the Elder (d. 1569)
1560 · Etching
Cleared · Public Domain
liveRights clearance desk for images
Museums publish two different things about the same artwork: whether the work is in copyright, and whether their picture of it is. OpenPlate reads both, does the arithmetic on the published term, and shows you the sentence behind every point of the score.
Where this page got its records
88 ms. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Collection API (Open Access)
21 ms. The Cleveland Museum of Art, Open Access API
2 of 2 providers answered live. 977 matching records exist across the two collections.
Institutions answered newest-first by record, interleaved

The Rabbit Hunt
Pieter Bruegel the Elder (d. 1569)
1560 · Etching
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Octafoil Mirror with Hunters and Prey
Unrecorded maker
late 600s–early 700s · Metalwork, bronze
Cleared · CC0
live
Plate 64: Rabbit hunter
Simon Guillain II (d. 1718)
1646 · Etching
Cleared · Public Domain
live
The Rabbit Hunt
Pieter Bruegel (d. 1569)
1560 · Print, etching
Cleared · CC0
live
The Hunters
Anthonie Waterloo (d. 1690)
17th century · Etching
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Samite fragment with hunters
Unrecorded maker
800s · Textile, Silk: compound twill
Cleared · CC0
live
The Rabbit Hunter
Anthonie Waterloo (d. 1690)
17th century · Etching; second state of two
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Silk Decorative Tunic Band with a Hunter
Unrecorded maker
700s · Textile, Silk: complementary weft-faced twill with inner warps (samit)
Cleared · CC0
live
Makana Rabbit Stick
Unrecorded maker
15th–17th century · Wood, leather
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Fragment, Part of an Ornament from a Garment
Unrecorded maker
400s · Textile, tabby weave with inwoven tapestry ornament, linen and wool
Cleared · CC0
live
The Rabbit Merchant
Thomas Rowlandson (d. 1827)
1810? · Hand-colored etching
Cleared · Public Domain
live
Fragment of a Tunic
Unrecorded maker
400s · Textile, tabby weave with inwoven tapestry ornament: linen
Cleared · CC0
live1. Pin the work
Choose the record and say what you are actually going to do with it. The product re-reads the work live and stores a snapshot, so your docket records what the institution said today.
2. Read the arithmetic
Six weighted factors: the institution's own claim, the creator's term, the publication-age rule, the restrictions in their statement, your use, and whether a credit line is even possible.
3. Seal and export
Record the decision into a SHA-384 chain, then export a dated docket as JSON, CSV or Markdown with the credit line and the seal a colleague can re-verify.